Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 26, P26-39, 2023

Download started.

Ok

Support with Single Ventricle-Ventricular Assist Device (sVAD) in Patients with Functionally Univentricular Circulation Prior to Fontan Operation

Published:February 02, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.pcsu.2022.12.002
      Some patients with functionally univentricular circulation develop cardiac failure refractory to maximal management and are supported with a ventricular assist device (VAD). The purpose of this manuscript is to summarize our previous publications related to single ventricle-ventricular assist device (sVAD) support in patients with functionally univentricular circulation and to describe our current institutional approach at University of Florida to sVAD support in neonates, infants, and children prior to Fontan. Our programmatic philosophy at University of Florida is to strive to identify the minority of neonates with functionally univentricular circulation who are extremely high-risk prior to initiating staged palliation and to stabilize these neonates with primary preemptive sVAD in preparation for cardiac transplantation; our rationale for this approach is related to the challenges associated with failed staged palliation and subsequent bail-out sVAD support and transplantation. A subset of extremely high-risk neonates and infants with functionally univentricular ductal-dependent circulation undergo primary preemptive sVAD insertion and subsequent cardiac transplantation. Support with VAD clearly facilitates survival on the waiting list during prolonged wait times and optimizes outcomes after Norwood (Stage 1) by providing an alternative pathway for extremely high-risk patients. Therefore, the selective utilization of sVAD in extremely high-risk neonates facilitates improved outcomes for all patients with functionally univentricular ductal-dependent circulation.
      At University of Florida, our programmatic approach to utilizing sVAD support as a bridge to transplantation in the minority of neonates with functionally univentricular circulation who are extremely high-risk for staged palliation is associated with Operative Mortality after Norwood (Stage 1) Operation of 2.9% (2/68) and a one-year survival of 91.1% (82/90) for all neonates presenting with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) or HLHS-related malformation with functionally univentricular ductal-dependent systemic circulation.
      Meanwhile, at University of Florida, for all 82 consecutive neonates, infants, and children supported with pulsatile paracorporeal VAD: Kaplan-Meier survival estimated one year after VAD insertion = 73.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 64.1–83.8%), and Kaplan-Meier survival estimated five years after VAD insertion = 68.3% (95% CI = 58.4–79.8%). For all 48 consecutive neonates, infants, and children at University of Florida with biventricular circulation supported with pulsatile paracorporeal VAD: Kaplan-Meier survival estimated one year after VAD insertion = 82.7% (95% CI = 72.4–94.4%), and Kaplan-Meier survival estimated five years after VAD insertion = 79.7% (95% CI = 68.6–92.6%). For all 34 consecutive neonates, infants, and children at University of Florida with functionally univentricular circulation supported with pulsatile paracorporeal sVAD: Kaplan-Meier survival estimated one year after VAD insertion = 59.7% (95% CI = 44.9–79.5%), and Kaplan-Meier survival estimated five years after VAD insertion = 50.5% (95% CI = 35.0–73.0%). These Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for patients supported with pulsatile paracorporeal VAD are better in patients with biventricular circulation in comparison to patients with functionally univentricular circulation both one year after VAD insertion (P=0.026) and five years after VAD insertion (P=0.010).
      Although outcomes after VAD support in functionally univentricular patients are worse than in patients with biventricular circulation, sVAD provides a reasonable chance for survival. Ongoing research is necessary to improve the outcomes of these challenging patients, with the goal of developing strategies where outcomes after sVAD support in functionally univentricular patients are equivalent to the outcomes achieved after VAD support in patients with biventricular circulation.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Philip J
        • Reyes K
        • Ebraheem M
        • et al.
        Hybrid procedure with pulsatile ventricular assist device for hypoplastic left heart syndrome awaiting transplantation.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019; 158 (Epub 2018 Dec 21. PMID:30737110): e59-e61https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.12.025
        • Philip J
        • Powers E
        • Machado D
        • et al.
        Pulsatile ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant for the early high-risk single-ventricle physiology.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021; 162 (Epub 2020 Oct 6. PMID:33546851; PMCID: PMC8767640): 405-413.e4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.09.071
        • Bleiweis MS
        • Philip J
        • Peek GJ
        • et al.
        Combined hybrid procedure and VAD insertion in 9 high-risk neonates and infants with HLHS.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2022; 114 (Epub 2021 Jun 27. PMID:34186096): 809-816https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.05.073
        • Bleiweis MS
        • Fudge JC
        • Peek GJ
        • et al.
        Ventricular assist device support in neonates and infants with a failing functionally univentricular circulation.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2021; 13 (PMID:35711213; PMCID: PMC9195634): 194-204https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.09.056
        • Bleiweis MS
        • Philip J
        • Peek GJ
        • et al.
        Palliation plus ventricular assist device insertion in 15 neonates and infants with functionally univentricular circulation.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2022; (S0003-4975(22)00336-8 Epub ahead of print. PMID:35304109)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.02.051
        • Bleiweis MS
        • Peek GJ
        • Philip J
        • et al.
        A comprehensive approach to the management of patients with HLHS and related malformations: an analysis of 83 patients (2015-2021).
        World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2022; 13 (Epub 2022 May 5. PMID:35511494): 664-675https://doi.org/10.1177/21501351221088030
        • Bleiweis MS
        • Stukov Y
        • Philip J
        • et al.
        Analysis of 82 children supported with pulsatile paracorporeal ventricular assist device: comparison of patients with biventricular versus univentricular circulation.
        Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022; (S1043-0679(22)00120-4Epub ahead of print. PMID:35584776)https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.05.002
        • Jacobs JP
        • Franklin RC
        • Jacobs ML
        • et al.
        Classification of the functionally univentricular heart: unity from mapped codes.
        Cardiol Young. 2006; 16 (PMID:16401358): 9-21https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951105002271
        • Jacobs JP
        • Franklin RCG
        • Béland MJ
        • et al.
        Nomenclature for Pediatric and congenital cardiac care: unification of clinical and administrative nomenclature - the 2021 International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code (IPCCC) and the eleventh revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11).
        Cardiol Young. 2021; 31 (PMID:34323211): 1057-1188https://doi.org/10.1017/S104795112100281X
        • Jacobs JP
        • Franklin RCG
        • Béland MJ
        • et al.
        Nomenclature for pediatric and congenital cardiac care: unification of clinical and administrative nomenclature - the 2021 International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code (IPCCC) and the eleventh revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11).
        World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2021; 12 (Epub 2021 Jul 26. PMID:34304616): E1-E18https://doi.org/10.1177/21501351211032919
        • Quintessenza JA
        • Morell VO
        • Jacobs JP.
        Achieving a balance in the current approach to the surgical treatment of hypoplastic left heart syndrome.
        Cardiol Young. 2004; 14 (PMID:15244153): 127-130https://doi.org/10.1017/s1047951104006456
        • Jacobs JP
        • Quintessenza JA
        • Chai PJ
        • et al.
        Rescue cardiac transplantation for failing staged palliation in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome.
        Cardiol Young. 2006; 16 (PMID:17116269): 556-562https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951106001223
        • Jacobs JP
        • O'Brien SM
        • Chai PJ
        • et al.
        Management of 239 patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and related malformations from 1993 to 2007.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2008; 85 (discussion 1697PMID:18442568): 1691-1696https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.01.057
        • Michielon G
        • Carotti A
        • Pongiglione G
        • Cogo P
        • Parisi F
        Orthotopic heart transplantation in patients with univentricular physiology.
        Curr Cardiol Rev. 2011; 7 (PMID:22548031; PMCID: PMC3197093): 85-91https://doi.org/10.2174/157340311797484259
        • Shah S
        • Asante-Korang A
        • Ghazarian SR
        • et al.
        Risk factors for survival after heart transplantation in children and young adults: a 22-year study of 179 transplants.
        World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2018; 9 (PMID:30157732): 557-564https://doi.org/10.1177/2150135118782190
        • Stackhouse KA
        • McCrindle BW
        • Blackstone EH
        • et al.
        Congenital heart surgeons’ society. surgical palliation or primary transplantation for aortic valve atresia.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020; 159 (Epub 2019 Sep 25. PMID:31740116): 1451-1461.e7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.08.104
        • Lorts A
        • Conway J
        • Schweiger M
        • et al.
        ISHLT consensus statement for the selection and management of pediatric and congenital heart disease patients on ventricular assist devices Endorsed by the American Heart Association.
        J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021; 40 (Epub 2021 May 20. PMID:34193359): 709-732https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2021.04.015
      1. Konstantinov IE, Cooper DKC, Adachi I, et al: Consensus statement on heart xenotransplantation in children: Toward clinical translation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Sep 6:S0022-5223(22)00926-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.09.001. Epub ahead of print. PMID:36184321

        • VanderPluym CJ
        • Cantor RS
        • Machado D
        • et al.
        Utilization and outcomes of children treated with direct thrombin inhibitors on paracorporeal ventricular assist device support.
        ASAIO J. 2020; 66 (PMID:32740356): 939-945https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001093
        • Ghbeis MB
        • Vander Pluym CJ
        • Thiagarajan RR.
        Hemostatic challenges in pediatric critical care medicine-hemostatic balance in VAD.
        Front Pediatr. 2021; 9 (PMID:33732668; PMCID: PMC7959853)625632https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.625632