Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 24, P62-66, 2021

Download started.

Ok

The Ross Procedure in Children: The Gold Standard?

  • Luke M. Wiggins
    Correspondence
    Address reprint requests to Luke M. Wiggins MD, Children's Hospital, Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd, Mailstop #66, Los Angeles, CA 90027.
    Affiliations
    Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

    Heart Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
    Search for articles by this author
  • S. Ram Kumar
    Affiliations
    Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

    Heart Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
    Search for articles by this author
  • Vaughn A. Starnes
    Affiliations
    Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

    Heart Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
    Search for articles by this author
      The management of aortic valve disease in the pediatric population is complex and requires an individualized approach and opportune application of techniques focused on each individual patient's specific anatomy, pathology, and clinical presentation. Though some patients may require variations in the approach to management, the ultimate goal should be to perform a Ross procedure when aortic valve replacement is indicated.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Campbell M
        • Kauntze R.
        Congenital aortic valvular stenosis.
        Br Heart J. 1953; 15: 179-194
        • Zeevi B
        • Keane JF
        • Castaneda AR
        • Perry SB
        • Lock JE.
        Neonatal critical valvar aortic stenosis: a comparison of surgical and balloon dilatation therapy.
        Circulation. 1989; 80: 831-839
        • Mosca RS
        • Iannettoni MD
        • Scwartz SM
        • Ludomirsky A
        • Beekman RH
        • Lloyd T
        • et al.
        Critical aortic stenosis in the neonate.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995; 109: 147-154
        • Boe BA
        • Zampi JD
        • Kennedy KF
        • et al.
        Acute success of balloon aortic valvuloplasty in the current era: a national cardiovascular data registry study.
        JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 17: 1717-1726
        • Zain Z
        • Zadinello M
        • Menahem S
        • Brizard C
        Neonatal isolated critical aortic valve stenosis: balloon valvuloplasty or surgical valvotomy.
        Heart Lung Circ. 2006; 15: 18-23
        • McElhinney DB
        • Lock JE
        • Keane JF
        • Moran AM
        • Colan SD.
        Left heart growth, function, and reintervention after balloon aortic valvuloplasty for neonatal aortic stenosis.
        Circ. 2005; 111: 451-458
        • D'Udekem Y
        • Siddiqui J
        • Seaman CS
        • et al.
        Long-term results of a strategy of aortic valve repair in the pediatric population.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 145: 461-469
        • Vergnat M
        • Asfour B
        • Arenz C
        • et al.
        Contemporary results of aortic valve repair for congenital heart disease: lessons for management and staged strategy.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017; 52: 581-587
        • Ozaki S
        • Kawase I
        • Yamashita H
        • et al.
        A total of 404 cases of aortic valve reconstruction with glutaraldehyde treated autologous pericardium.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 147: 301-306
        • Ozaki S
        • Kawase I
        • Yamashita H
        • et al.
        Midterm outcomes after aortic valve neocuspidization with glutaraldehyde treated autologous pericardium.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 155: 2379-2387
        • Wiggins LM
        • Mimic B
        • Issitt R
        • et al.
        The utility of aortic valve leaflet reconstruction techniques in children and young adults.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019; : 1-10
        • Saleeb SF
        • Newburger JW
        • Geva T
        • et al.
        Accerlerated degeneration of a bovine pericardial bioprosthesthetic aortic valve in children and young adults.
        Circ. 2014; 130: 51-60
        • Chan V
        • Malas T
        • Lapierre H
        • et al.
        Reoperation of left heart valve bioprosthesis according to age at implantation.
        Circulation. 2011; 124: S75-S80
        • Myers PO
        • Mokashi SA
        • Horgan E
        • et al.
        Outcomes after mechanical aortic valve replacement in children and young adults with congenital heart disease.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019; 157: 329-340
        • Nishimura RA
        • Otto CM
        • Borrow RO
        • et al.
        AHA/ACC guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practive guidelines.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 148 (2104): e1-132
        • Matchar DB
        • Jacobson A
        • Dolor R
        • et al.
        Effect of home testing of international normalized ratio on clinical events.
        NEJM. 2010; 363: 1608-1620
        • Ansell J
        • Caro JJ
        • Salas M
        • et al.
        Quality of clinical documentation and anticoagulation control in patients with chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in routine medical care.
        Am J Med Qual. 2007; 22: 327-333
        • Shanmugam G
        • MacArthur K
        • Pollock J.
        Mechanical aortic valve replacement; long-term outcomes in children.
        J Heart Valve Disease. 2005; 14: 166-171
        • Alexiou C
        • McDonald A
        • Langley SM
        • et al.
        Aortic valve replacement in children: are mechanical prosthesis a good option?.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000; 17: 125-133
        • Cappelleri JC
        • Fiore LD
        • Brophy MT
        • et al.
        Efficacy and Safety of combined anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy versus anticoagulant monotherapy after mechanical heart valve replacement: a metaanalysis.
        Am Heart J. 1995; 130: 547-552
        • Bradley SM.
        Aortic valve insufficiency in the teenager and young adult: the role of prosthetic valve replacement.
        World Jr Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2013; 4: 397-402
        • Alsoufi B
        • Al-Halees Z
        • Manlhiot C
        • et al.
        Mechanical valves versus the Ross procedure for aortic valve replacement in children: propensity-adjusted comparison of long-term outcomes.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 137: 362
        • Bansal N
        • Kumar SR
        • Baker CJ
        • et al.
        Age-related outcomes of the ross procedure over 20 years.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 99: 2077-2085
        • Kumar SR
        • Bansal N
        • Wells WJ
        • et al.
        Outcomes of reintervention on the autograft after the Ross Procedure.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102: 1517-1521